Comparison of Inventor to Solidworks - Autodesk Community - Why would you look for Solidworks best alternatives?

Looking for:

CAD Review: Autodesk Inventor Vs Solidworks.CAD Review: Autodesk Inventor Vs Solidworks 

Click here to DOWNLOAD

   

 

Autodesk inventor vs solidworks Jobs, Employment | Freelancer.Solved: Which is best Solidworks or Inventor? - Autodesk Community

 

By doing so, we can autodesk inventor 2018 vs solidworks free CAD enthusiasts and beginners figure out what the real similarities and differences are between popular software packages. It was created by SolidWorks Corporation, who had been working on it sinceand was finally released as the first significant 3D modeler for Windows in It ended up being a huge milestone in the evolution of CAD.

And the minds behind it? A team of engineers led by Jon Hirschtick. Recognize the name? Catering fully to the needs of engineers and designers, Dassault incorporated simulation capabilities in These were later developed to include aspects like Finite Element Analysis. And who knows what the future will bring! As the name suggests, SolidWorks is a solid autodesk inventor 2018 vs solidworks free program.

Using a parametric feature-based approach, SolidWorks enables users to create models, parts and assemblies. Models in the software typically begin as a 2D sketch before the parts are extruded into 3D using a variety of SolidWorks tools.

In fact, the latest updates in SolidWorks now enable users to autodesk inventor 2018 vs solidworks free with even larger assemblies and edit them in читать статью design review mode. Of course, no matter how great the modeling capabilities are, a real CAD package is determined by its simulation tools.

With that in mind, SolidWorks has a wide selection of simulation tools on offer to enable users to throw real-world conditions at their models and products. Example tools include topology optimization to provide stress and frequency constraints when optimizing parts, the ability to test for static linear, time-based motion and high-cycle fatigue, and features to assess endurance under static, thermal and buckling conditions.

With SolidWorks Sustainability, users can even measure the environmental impacts of designs, including the effects of materials, assembly and disposal. Other tools include Product Data Management solutions—improving the way teams manage and collaborate on product development—and innovative visualization capabilities.

This comes as no real surprise, given the sheer number of tools and capabilities that this software suite boasts. Looking to join the fold? SolidWorks has a place in any industry looking for solutions to engineering problems. The British Ministry of Defense, for example, have used SolidWorks in the past to design strategic defense equipment, arms, vehicles and vessels. Additional industries include research and education, making use of SolidWorks to access the autodesk inventor 2018 vs solidworks free in engineering technology and gain skills needed by those in engineering industries.

The product was first released to the public in Before it came into being, however, Autodesk had its own 3D parametric tool called Designer, later evolving into a mechanical desktop design tool.

Just imagine what the CAD industry would have looked like then! Instead, Autodesk looked towards creating a competitor in the form of Autodesk Autodesk inventor 2018 vs solidworks free. It would load complex assemblies in next to no time at all by segmenting the graphical data from the model data. Microsoft access 2013 full crack free fact, it still stands as such today.

Autodesk Inventor is a 2D and 3D mechanical design, simulation, visualization and documentation autodesk inventor 2018 vs solidworks free package. Beyond parametric modeling options, Inventor also provides direct edit and freeform modeling tools. With time being of the autodesk inventor 2018 vs solidworks free for any mechanical engineer, Inventor speeds up design processes by automating aspects like the advanced geometry creation of intelligent parts, e.

Like any CAD software worth its salt, Autodesk Inventor comes armed with a wide range of simulation tools to help engineers create the perfect product and minimize manufacturing costs. Additionally, its capabilities include part and assembly-level motion simulation and stress analysis functionality.

Of course, this is just the tip of the iceberg for Autodesk Inventor. Users can improve design workflows by making use of additional design tools, such as add-ins like sheet metal, injection molds, chains and frame design. And, with features like shared view collaboration, anyone can review and comment on shared models in Autodesk viewer. Autodesk has a wide range of software packages on offer—AutoCAD is easily its most popular flagship product, with thousands of users using it worldwide.

Despite its wide capabilities, however, AutoCAD falls short when it comes to aspects like mechanical engineering. Offering more specialized, mechanical toolsets, Inventor bridges the gap between design, engineering and manufacturing. Autodesk Inventor is used in autodesk inventor 2018 vs solidworks free engineering, tool making, sheet metal processing, plant construction, and a whole lot more. Almost any industry that designs and manufactures mechanical or electrical перейти на страницу uses Inventor.

This company provides steel and equipment for constructing high-voltage, open-air substations. As with any other product from CAD giant Autodesk, Inventor comes with a vast range of specialized tools and features to take product design to the next level:.

SolidWorks is an industry-standard choice, offering specialist software with an easier learning curve. Autodesk Inventor, блестящая graphics card driver update windows 7 free вернемся comparison, offers architectural capabilities and student licensing. No matter which software package you choose, however, Scan2CAD can help streamline your workflow. Looking to use your old drawings in SolidWorks or Inventor? Want to stay updated on all the latest CAD news and guides?

Keep a close eye on the Scan2CAD blog! Looking for the free trial? Download the free trial Looking for support? Contact Support. Join thousands of happy customers worldwide. Free Autodesk Inventor licensing for students. Predominantly used in aerospace, automotives, construction, consumer product industries. Used in engineering automotive and construction industries. Has the option to export to Revit to make architectural drawings.

Large online community, complete with tutorials and resources. Smaller online presence—with tutorials and resources—which can hinder learning.

 

Solidworks: Best Alternatives and Competitors in .Inventor Vs SolidWorks | Which is Better & Why? ()

 

Hi, I am currently using Inventor Pro and it is great software for mechanical engineering design. But some of my friends recommends Solidworks is good for 3d design. So I posted this question. Go to Solution. All software has its pros and cons. You have to decided which application fits your needs. Weight the pros and cons. Just because your friends say this package is better doesn't mean it better for you. Mark Lancaster. Did this resolve your issue? Please accept it "As a Solution" so others may benefit from it.

Much has been discussed on this topic in the past, please spend some time reading those discussions first, and then return to ask more specific questions if needed. See link:. In general "which is rree product X or product Y? Again you can find those topics at the link Autodewk posted above. I hope this helps.

I do have to point out that you posted this question to a group of individuals on an Autodesk forum, most of whom make their living using Inventor. That said, I think you should maybe give us a little more information about what you want to use this for, as some software is better at one thing than others So, knowing what you will use it for may help us to advise you better.

Thanks for reply. I want to use inventor for motor car engine design and manufacturing, heat and thermal effects analysis. This is an interesting question but I am not sure how you would be able to find the answer anywhere.

My question is autodeskk you define "best. If one of them was not up to the task, it should have been gone by now. You might be able to find an answer больше на странице which is better of the two in terms of a specific workflow or a specific design.

There is soliddorks wrong using SWX. Nor is nothing wrong using Inventor. Nowadays, these major players support associative interoperable workflows.

One can read the other's file somewhat associatively. It is windows 10 vs windows 7 home premium free multi-CAD world. We have customers using multiple tools. At the end of the day, it is about how to get the job done reliably and quickly. I work for Inventor team. You know my answer. They each have their own followers However, why not ask. They will prefer to take on someone who is trained in these tools and has an official training Certificate to prove it. A lot of companies you listed here use different CAD systems for different purposes at different divisions.

I don't think they use singular autodesk inventor 2018 vs solidworks free. Some also use Inventor. Take the ultra high performance race car maker Koenigsegg Engieering for example. They also use Inventor along with other CAD systems. Please see the public link below. With both you can go from A to B Solixworks not listen who tell you that all cad are the same, like here. I suppose they never used and tested frde at least 2 years I might have to do with time spent in the package, but even now I feel you need much more clicks to do the same.

After some time these little annoyances might disappear. It is also difficult to find the package that belong to your needs, when frde don't know autodesk inventor 2018 vs solidworks free package is able to do. I have attended most the Solidworks courses. And passed the Associate, and Sheet Metal Professional exams. So invenyor used Solidworks a lot. And in my opioin Inventor is a lot better. But like people have said, it depends what you want it for.

For me i wanted Sheet Metal and iLogic. Solidworks office license key free microsoft 2016 purchase change models /49098.txt good as Inventor. I can change my models in seconds. And on the courses i went on no one vw get my model to change that quick in Solidworks. They could not even get it to change how i wanted it to.

I also found the people teaching in the training courses wasn't as knowledgeable as solidworkw were on the Inventor courses. And i went to 3 different training centers, and it was the same at all of them. This is partly due to they was straight out of university, so hadn't used the software in a real design environment. So did not understand a lot of inventod i ffee them. Whereas the people training the Inventor courses had all worked in a auhodesk area for a number of years.

So understood more. Does SolidWorks? The correct invwntor is - No. If that is not normal - which CAD programs do? I have used both daily autodesk inventor 2018 vs solidworks free years and am a certified professional in both. Would you recommend that the OP listen to my opinions which I can back up with examples in both softwares?

If I may, if you are needing 3x the steps and operations in Inventor vs SWX, I'd say you're not doing it correctly and may need professional training. Typical Adesk software, if you know one way to do it, there's at least another 4 other ways.

Not sure what you inveentor by "often without a specific command or way". Can you explain? Better yet, have you posted autodesk inventor 2018 vs solidworks free issues on the main board? Solidworkz comment of "Inventor isn't multicore in 3d modeling " is false, sorry. Inventor does in 201 access and invnetor multi-core, but only for commands that require it.

Think a basic linear Extrude, versus Stress analysis. In general terms SWX and Inventor are the same, but they each have their differences. Were you professionally trained on SWX? If so, I'll bet you compared the two back autofesk as well. I've worked with both, often at the same time. Our parts were being held or had to be held to the 4th decimal and this type of failure rate was and would have killed us. That was SWX's release. Haven't used it since. The other main issue he had was while in Inventor we were able to easily use equations in parameters and elsewhere, SWX until invenror recently didn't offer such.

Feee used it extensively. Solidwokrs, it all comes down to how you use the software. The best advice I can give is get a trial version 30 days typically isn't enough, but that's all you'll get and run the softwares frew your typical daily routines. But, and this is a biggie, understand that you simply don't know the autodesk inventor 2018 vs solidworks free advanced autodesk inventor 2018 vs solidworks free of these softwares and therefore will be stuck dealing with the basics.

It's extremely hard to not compare the basics of a software you aren't well versed with to the more advanced commands you typically use on a software you are well versed with. Quick example of that, a few years back I started teaching an Inventor Intro class, the first few classes I struggled and the students actually questioned if I knew the software or not.

At that point I showed them the more advanced commands I'd use to do what the invdntor was covering, jaws dropped. The issue was I hadn't used those basic commands in splidworks years, I had moved on autodesk inventor 2018 vs solidworks free the move advanced and more efficient way of creating the same features. I windows 10 pro 64 key freefree had to relearn the software basics.

O'Flaherty, autodesk inventor 2018 vs solidworks free go into small computers. There's no future in them" - Dr. Choi circa You might have over-valued your contribution to the discussion.

   

 

Autodesk inventor 2018 vs solidworks free

   

I help out here because my work goes so fast in Inventor that if I don't pace myself to slow down, I will be out of work. Bob S. This give all you time to make web sites and be in this room to help. Now solidworks has very little down time so they can not help as much.

Message 6 of The support SW offers was fantastic. Everytime I had questions I had phone support from the re-seller or they visited us on site to help. Something I miss. I will say, you will not find better online user help as I have had using IV, simply unmatched. The decision comes down to putting the 2 thru in house tests on real jobs to see which you prefer. Message 7 of Interesting - duffield, can you tell me whether SW allows the recording of a macro? That's about the only thing I would switch products for.

I am anxiously waiting to see if IV9 includes this capability. Message 8 of Yes "nashville" wrote in message news Message 9 of I'm with duffield here. I used SW for 4 years and have great response from users on the comp.

Also my VAR was never more than a phone call away. However I have also had similar success with this DG. Don't know about the VAR yet Alan M. Etzkorn Nixon Tool Co. Message 10 of Mark, This feature your talking about was leveraged from MDT.

It looks very slick in SW, but, in creating those hole and fastener connections between plates creates whats called "an incontext edit" between parts. In Inventor we call it Adaptivity, and we can turn it off at any time. You dont have that option in SW. Basically, the 2 plates that are mated together with the fasteners are "Mated for life". SW says you can break the link and life goes on.

During training, ask the instructor how to break those links in a couple of clicks and watch him fumble with it for 10 minutes and tell you when he's through "I think thats all there is to it".

Its a neat demo trick, but not very efficient. IF you like to use a lot of common parts that tool is not the way to go. Tell you managers that the "oohs and aahs" from had from the demo quickly turn to groans and grips soon after. Another thing I noticed in the demo and training I recently had was that the weldment feature in SW looks very impressive, and for the most part it is, but it is not as mature as Inventors weld features. Cosmetic welds are still cosmetic welds, but if you use the bead feature SW creates a bead solid model that the file uses.

Also place some holes near an edge that will get a weld bead. SW doesn't recognize the hole and covers it with the bead. Overall the weld feature is a little squirrelly, I cant tell you how many times I've had violent crashes to desktop using the tool. I have more grips, email me if you need anymore ammo Mike. Message 11 of I'd call your IV reseller for help Message 12 of Message 13 of Message 14 of I found that detailing in SW was for the most part more than adequate. I would never had exported to detail in anything else I always used the dimensioning from the model.

Now in IV I try to use nothing but retrieve dimensions, however it doesn't always work. I personally don't understand why anyone would detail in anything but the parametric package.

Not a flame To me that is one of the biggest reasons for having a parametric modeler. Message 15 of Charles, I spend some time constructing a library of common parts, etc, but for the most part I have not used iParts. I had tried them before and they did not behave like I had expected. I had hoped that they would stay a reference item in the library, adjusting each time they were referenced, but instead they just create new parts in the project based on the iPart.

Granted they do have their use, but most of my common parts are also not really suitable for an iPart factory, either because they never change or the changes are not compatible with what I would think can be done with an iPart. Now iFeatures may be of more use to me, and also some custom programs. So I try to spend my spare "slow down" time formulating plans for custom programs and learning how to program them in VBA.

My recently released ReadPointsFromFile macro was a direct result of this and has already resulted in me saving even more time designing. I've currently been working on turning it into an addin and improving it a bit more. This CAD software gives you the most popular 3D modeling tools such as booleans, extrude, etc.

But it also offers a large number of dedicated tools called modules. They include technical sketching, robot simulation tooling, rendering, architecture, and mechanical machining modules.

This 3D modeling software is very well known by industry experts. It is primarily used for architecture, interior design, or landscape architecture, but also engineering projects and video games.

SketchUp works with both 2D and 3D. You first create a 2D sketch and then extrude it by pulling or pushing options. It is very user-friendly and intuitive. SketchUp has an easy learning curve, but will also provide you with professional texturing and lighting options for photorealistic renders and animations. It will provide you with customized tools for mechanical engineering projects. The results of your 3D modeling will be precise and accurate allowing you to produce technical documentation of your project.

AutoCAD is mainly used in the construction, mechanical engineering, and architectural industries. Yet another engineering-grade CAD software. OnShape will provide you with advanced tools to produce 2D drawings, complex assemblies, and automate your workflows. What makes this 3D modeling program stand out is that you work online. This is an especially efficient solution for teams collaborating on one project.

The changes are applied in real life which saves you and your engineering team a lot of time and problems between exchanging files and consulting the project. This 3D modeling program is well known for its user-friendliness and pleasant UI.

It has some pretty impressive CAD tools to produce highly precise 3D models, enabling rapid prototyping and allowing you to carry out simulations and prepare your project for manufacturing.

Fusion is definitely great for mechanical engineering and product development purposes. Are you interested in a software comparison? Fusion vs Inventor or Fusion vs Solidworks. The main purpose of Autodesk Inventor is to allow you to design complex mechanical systems, analyze them and prepare them for manufacturing. The package includes 3D modeling, sheet metal design, tube and pipe design, and electrical system design.

You will be provided with advanced simulation tooling and much more. SolveSpace is open-source CAD software. It is simple and easy to learn. You can use both 2D drawings and 3D modeling tools to produce technical and precise parts. It gives quite a few exporting options, and you can prepare your model for water jetting, laser cutting and 3D printing. SolveSpace might look simple, but it has some interesting tools such as mechanism design to simulate how the device would work.

Shapr3D is a bit of an exception because, in fact, it is a mobile app. However, it is still pretty powerful and capable of fairly complex CAD design. It is definitely an interesting solution for engineers and designers who keep mobility at work. This 3D modeling software stands out for providing you with plenty of operations. From accurate technical tools to free-form 3D modeling and 3D animations, you get a wide spectrum of 3D solutions.

Rhino prides itself on being easy to learn, fast and highly precise. As an online 3D printing service, we have first-hand experience of Rhino and we can certainly recommend it.

Solid Edge, a product of Siemens, is actually very similar to Solidworks. However, it made it to our Top 10 Solidworks alternatives list as it introduces a different take on CAD modeling. In contrast to parametric modeling, with Solid Edge, you will be using synchronous technology, which allows you to edit elements of an assembly without the risk of misfunctioning of the whole structure.

Rhino vs Sketchup , comparing these two programs could also help you make the perfect choice. As you can see, there are quite a few alternatives to Solidworks.